Comments on: Getting Started with Continuous Integration http://devshaped.com/2009/04/getting-started-with-continuous-integration/ Sat, 19 Jun 2010 20:01:03 -0300 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Derek http://devshaped.com/2009/04/getting-started-with-continuous-integration/comment-page-1/#comment-4853 Derek Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:47:05 +0000 http://devshaped.com/2009/04/getting-started-with-continuous-integration/#comment-4853 JB, Sondre does say there are "many providers of SCM software; for the purpose of this article we will use Microsoft Visual SourceSafe." The article he links to by Eric Sink lists several SCM options including Subversion and Vault. The Sink article is a number of years old and doesn't cover more recent offerings including Git, Mercurial, and Microsoft Team Foundation source control. JB,

Sondre does say there are “many providers of SCM software; for the purpose of this article we will use Microsoft Visual SourceSafe.” The article he links to by Eric Sink lists several SCM options including Subversion and Vault.

The Sink article is a number of years old and doesn’t cover more recent offerings including Git, Mercurial, and Microsoft Team Foundation source control.

]]> By: JB King http://devshaped.com/2009/04/getting-started-with-continuous-integration/comment-page-1/#comment-4852 JB King Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:36:54 +0000 http://devshaped.com/2009/04/getting-started-with-continuous-integration/#comment-4852 Is there a reason for not mentioning Subversion as a means of source control? I find it much better than Visual Sourcesafe for version control and handling multiple checkouts and merges and branching/tagging. Is there a reason for not mentioning Subversion as a means of source control? I find it much better than Visual Sourcesafe for version control and handling multiple checkouts and merges and branching/tagging.

]]>